For #1 thanks for the hint Julian. Would it make sense to break the really essential bits of e2fsprogs into a new binary "fsprogs" then. And make e2fsprogs depend on it to not break anyone. After that the essential seed could be changed from e2fsprogs -> fsprogs
And yes - this would also be a transition from "Essential: yes" as well. I did not expect this to be resolved super fast anyway, but to start it or it would be done never. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1829370 Title: Discuss further entries in essential which might instead be minimal To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/livecd-rootfs/+bug/1829370/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list [email protected] https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
