* -doc package: I think we should promote it as well in main, if the -dev is promoted. If so, this dep should be fixed: Depends: lynx | www-browser (first is lynx, in universe, www-browser is a virtual package not fullfiled?). In addition, it ships the doc in devhelp format (despite symlink from doc/ to gtk-doc/). I don't think anyway that those are needed, we don't tend to have -doc dep on a browser implementation.
Opened question: should the tests run as autopkgtests? (Unsure if they are pure unit or interact with the rest of the system) Second time a copyright file is up to date (last update in 2015 ;)) So, once the -doc thingy is sorted out, +1 for me. Same than other, security review would be nice as part of the dlna stack. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1799974 Title: [MIR] gupnp To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gupnp/+bug/1799974/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
