On Wed, 4 Jul 2018, 22:05 Steve Langasek, <steve.langa...@canonical.com> wrote:
> reviewing the diff, my biggest concern is that there appear to be new > udev rules upstream. Are we going to be shipping these new upstream > udev rules in the mdadm package? Have you examined the impact on other > block layers, in particular lvm where I believe we are shipping non- > upstream rules? > Yes there are new additional udev rules. The safe timeout one, is auxiliary, and does not affect any other parts of the system. Also, it looks like it would fail on non-usrmerged systems and thus needs adjustment. The creation udev rule, should not affect the state of the raid devices during raid controller assembly. As this stamp file affects only initial assembly/creation of raid devices. His is mostly for internal state tracking / marking device systemd unit as ready. Clustering support udev rules I cannot comment on. As I am yet to use clustering support. And our installers do not set these up. Validating, and correcting (if needed) clustering support is an open task for development series. > -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1779685 Title: [18.04.1] Backport support for Intel VROC arrays in mdadm To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/mdadm/+bug/1779685/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
