Got similar behavior with windows server 2012r2 VMs.

Environment:

uname -a
Linux ubuntu-q87 4.13.0-37-generic #42~16.04.1-Ubuntu SMP Wed Mar 7 16:03:28 
UTC 2018 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux

ii  linux-image-4.13.0-36-generic
4.13.0-36.40~16.04.1                                               amd64
Linux kernel image for version 4.13.0 on 64 bit x86 SMP

apt policy qemu
qemu:
  Installed: (none)
  Candidate: 1:2.11+dfsg-1ubuntu5~cloud0
  Version table:
     1:2.11+dfsg-1ubuntu5~cloud0 500

Windows VMs error out and create a memory dump:

The computer has rebooted from a bugcheck.  The bugcheck was: 0x00000109
(0xa3a01f5891f186c5, 0xb3b72bdee47188a0, 0x0000032000000000,
0x0000000000000017). A dump was saved in: C:\Windows\MEMORY.DMP. Report
Id: 033018-31234-01.

Based on microsoft docs:

https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/windows-hardware/drivers/debugger/bug-check-0x109---critical-structure-corruption
CRITICAL_STRUCTURE_CORRUPTION Parameters
Parameter  Description
1 Reserved
2 Reserved
3 Reserved
4 The type of the corrupted region. (See the following table later on this 
page.)

...
0x17 Local APIC modification <--- this


Which is the same as with other reports out there:

https://www.spinics.net/lists/kvm/msg159977.html
https://forum.proxmox.com/threads/new-windows-vm-keeps-dying.39145/#post-193639


>From what I see the change was backported but there was no new build yet.
 
http://kernel.ubuntu.com/git/ubuntu/ubuntu-xenial.git/commit/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c?h=hwe&id=78d2542b88d16

See https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1738972

I suggest this is marked as a duplicate to 1738972

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1728256

Title:
  Memory corruption in Windows 10 guest / amd64

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/qemu/+bug/1728256/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

Reply via email to