Launchpad has imported 24 comments from the remote bug at https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=678518.
If you reply to an imported comment from within Launchpad, your comment will be sent to the remote bug automatically. Read more about Launchpad's inter-bugtracker facilities at https://help.launchpad.net/InterBugTracking. ------------------------------------------------------------------------ On 2011-02-18T10:41:17+00:00 Kamil wrote: Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): libidn-1.19-2.fc15.x86_64 How reproducible: 100 % Steps to Reproduce: 1. run the attached reproducer Additional info: The bug breaks builds of rawhide curl: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/getfile?taskID=2846952&name=build.log Reply at: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/valgrind/+bug/852760/comments/9 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ On 2011-02-18T10:46:46+00:00 Kamil wrote: Created attachment 479480 a reproducer Reply at: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/valgrind/+bug/852760/comments/10 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ On 2011-02-18T10:48:43+00:00 Kamil wrote: $ curl -JO 'https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=479480' $ sh bz678518.c Invalid read of size 4 at 0x4E33791: idna_to_ascii_4z (idna.c:514) by 0x4E33A34: idna_to_ascii_8z (idna.c:565) by 0x4E33A98: idna_to_ascii_lz (idna.c:597) by 0x4005A3: main (bz678518.c:15) Address 0x5405fcc is 12 bytes inside a block of size 15 alloc'd at 0x4C284F2: realloc (vg_replace_malloc.c:525) by 0x4E3380A: idna_to_ascii_4z (idna.c:514) by 0x4E33A34: idna_to_ascii_8z (idna.c:565) by 0x4E33A98: idna_to_ascii_lz (idna.c:597) by 0x4005A3: main (bz678518.c:15) Reply at: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/valgrind/+bug/852760/comments/11 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ On 2011-02-18T11:19:48+00:00 Kamil wrote: *** Bug 678521 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** Reply at: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/valgrind/+bug/852760/comments/12 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ On 2011-02-18T13:30:56+00:00 Miroslav wrote: Looks like a gcc bug, perhaps a wrong assumption about alignment of the buffer returned by realloc? Reproducer: #include <stdio.h> #include <string.h> #include <stdlib.h> int main() { char *x; x = malloc(4); x = realloc(x, 15); sprintf(x, "www.xn--4cab6c"); return strlen(x); } Can this cause problems outside valgrind? Reply at: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/valgrind/+bug/852760/comments/13 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ On 2011-02-18T16:37:12+00:00 Jakub wrote: No, this is yet another case where valgrind just don't understand common programming techniques. Here, gcc knows it can assume that x from the realloc is 2 * sizeof (void *) bytes aligned, therefore it implements strlen with this tuning as an inlined loop which reads a word at a time and looks for zero bytes in it. It knows it won't crash if there is a zero byte before end of cliff, so it doesn't matter if it reads 1-7 extra bytes after malloced block when the access is aligned. See e.g. https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=264936 but right now it is not anywhere near a fix upstream. Reply at: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/valgrind/+bug/852760/comments/14 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ On 2011-02-18T17:11:11+00:00 Kamil wrote: Is there any gcc flag to disable the optimization that causes problems to valgrind while keeping all the other -O2 optimization passes? Reply at: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/valgrind/+bug/852760/comments/15 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ On 2011-02-18T17:23:36+00:00 Jakub wrote: -fno-builtin-strlen, but you really don't want to use that, it will penalize code way too much (then even strlen ("abc") isn't folded etc.). Just live with valgrind false positives, any time it reports a read access with size N as M bytes inside a block of size O alloc'd where (M % N) == 0 && M == (O & ~(N - 1)) && O > M it is suspect you might be looking at a valgrind false positive. Reply at: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/valgrind/+bug/852760/comments/16 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ On 2011-02-18T17:43:13+00:00 Kamil wrote: (In reply to comment #7) > -fno-builtin-strlen, but you really don't want to use that, it will penalize > code way too much (then even strlen ("abc") isn't folded etc.). Thanks. Any chance to get back the 'repnz scasb'-based implementation that -O1 produces? > Just live with valgrind false positives, any time it reports a read access > with size N as M bytes inside a block of size O alloc'd > where (M % N) == 0 && M == (O & ~(N - 1)) && O > M it is suspect you might be > looking at a valgrind false positive. That's something hard to distinguish from the regular off-by-one errors occurring in C code as long as the unrolled strlen() does not appear on the backtrace. Reply at: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/valgrind/+bug/852760/comments/17 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ On 2011-02-18T17:47:01+00:00 Jakub wrote: Off by one errors typically would not be accessing in one read some bytes that are part of the allocation and some bytes after it, it would be a whole access to bytes after the allocation. Reply at: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/valgrind/+bug/852760/comments/18 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ On 2011-02-18T18:08:21+00:00 Kamil wrote: That's true. I've disabled use of valgrind for the particular failing test-case for now, will look for a more generic solution if the problem spreads over more test-cases. http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/scm- commits/2011-February/567665.html Reply at: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/valgrind/+bug/852760/comments/19 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ On 2013-04-03T18:09:02+00:00 Fedora wrote: This bug appears to have been reported against 'rawhide' during the Fedora 19 development cycle. Changing version to '19'. (As we did not run this process for some time, it could affect also pre-Fedora 19 development cycle bugs. We are very sorry. It will help us with cleanup during Fedora 19 End Of Life. Thank you.) More information and reason for this action is here: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers/HouseKeeping/Fedora19 Reply at: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/valgrind/+bug/852760/comments/31 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ On 2014-01-31T07:59:56+00:00 Stef wrote: This also affects p11-kit on both Fedora 19 and Fedora 20. Running 'make memcheck' target for valgrind on p11-kit exposes this bug with issues like this: FAIL: test-token ==4047== Invalid read of size 4 ==4047== at 0x40EA07: on_pem_block (parser.c:616) ==4047== by 0x41079D: p11_pem_parse (pem.c:228) ==4047== by 0x40DE38: parse_pem_certificates (parser.c:665) ==4047== by 0x40F120: p11_parse_memory (parser.c:753) ==4047== Address 0x54afc20 is 16 bytes inside a block of size 18 alloc'd ==4047== at 0x4A081D4: calloc (in /usr/lib64/valgrind/vgpreload_memcheck-amd64-linux.so) ==4047== by 0x40E9D8: on_pem_block (parser.c:612) ==4047== by 0x41079D: p11_pem_parse (pem.c:228) ==4047== by 0x40DE38: parse_pem_certificates (parser.c:665) Reply at: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/valgrind/+bug/852760/comments/32 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ On 2015-01-09T16:34:35+00:00 Fedora wrote: This message is a notice that Fedora 19 is now at end of life. Fedora has stopped maintaining and issuing updates for Fedora 19. It is Fedora's policy to close all bug reports from releases that are no longer maintained. Approximately 4 (four) weeks from now this bug will be closed as EOL if it remains open with a Fedora 'version' of '19'. Package Maintainer: If you wish for this bug to remain open because you plan to fix it in a currently maintained version, simply change the 'version' to a later Fedora version. Thank you for reporting this issue and we are sorry that we were not able to fix it before Fedora 19 is end of life. If you would still like to see this bug fixed and are able to reproduce it against a later version of Fedora, you are encouraged change the 'version' to a later Fedora version prior this bug is closed as described in the policy above. Although we aim to fix as many bugs as possible during every release's lifetime, sometimes those efforts are overtaken by events. Often a more recent Fedora release includes newer upstream software that fixes bugs or makes them obsolete. Reply at: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/valgrind/+bug/852760/comments/33 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ On 2015-02-17T13:38:54+00:00 Fedora wrote: Fedora 19 changed to end-of-life (EOL) status on 2015-01-06. Fedora 19 is no longer maintained, which means that it will not receive any further security or bug fix updates. As a result we are closing this bug. If you can reproduce this bug against a currently maintained version of Fedora please feel free to reopen this bug against that version. If you are unable to reopen this bug, please file a new report against the current release. If you experience problems, please add a comment to this bug. Thank you for reporting this bug and we are sorry it could not be fixed. Reply at: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/valgrind/+bug/852760/comments/34 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ On 2015-02-17T14:32:35+00:00 Kamil wrote: The bug still exists in Fedora 21: $ rpm -q valgrind valgrind-3.10.1-1.fc21.x86_64 $ curl -JO 'https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=479480' curl: Saved to filename 'bz678518.c' $ sh bz678518.c ==543== Memcheck, a memory error detector ==543== Copyright (C) 2002-2013, and GNU GPL'd, by Julian Seward et al. ==543== Using Valgrind-3.10.1 and LibVEX; rerun with -h for copyright info ==543== Command: ./a.out ==543== ==543== Invalid read of size 4 ==543== at 0x3EB8A056EB: idna_to_ascii_4z (idna.c:529) ==543== by 0x3EB8A05947: idna_to_ascii_8z (idna.c:582) ==543== by 0x3EB8A059A9: idna_to_ascii_lz (idna.c:614) ==543== by 0x400685: main (bz678518.c:15) ==543== Address 0x4c45fcc is 12 bytes inside a block of size 15 alloc'd ==543== at 0x4A08B1C: realloc (in /usr/lib64/valgrind/vgpreload_memcheck-amd64-linux.so) ==543== by 0x3EB8A05764: idna_to_ascii_4z (idna.c:530) ==543== by 0x3EB8A05947: idna_to_ascii_8z (idna.c:582) ==543== by 0x3EB8A059A9: idna_to_ascii_lz (idna.c:614) ==543== by 0x400685: main (bz678518.c:15) ==543== www.xn--4cab6c.se ==543== ==543== HEAP SUMMARY: ==543== in use at exit: 18 bytes in 1 blocks ==543== total heap usage: 27 allocs, 26 frees, 35,129 bytes allocated ==543== ==543== LEAK SUMMARY: ==543== definitely lost: 18 bytes in 1 blocks ==543== indirectly lost: 0 bytes in 0 blocks ==543== possibly lost: 0 bytes in 0 blocks ==543== still reachable: 0 bytes in 0 blocks ==543== suppressed: 0 bytes in 0 blocks ==543== Rerun with --leak-check=full to see details of leaked memory ==543== ==543== For counts of detected and suppressed errors, rerun with: -v ==543== ERROR SUMMARY: 1 errors from 1 contexts (suppressed: 0 from 0) Reply at: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/valgrind/+bug/852760/comments/35 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ On 2015-02-17T14:51:32+00:00 Mark wrote: Note the issue is really in libidn and the reproducer needs libidn-devel (and libidn-debuginfo) installed. The workaround is to run with --partial-loads-ok=yes --partial-loads-ok=<yes|no> [default: no] Controls how Memcheck handles 32-, 64-, 128- and 256-bit naturally aligned loads from addresses for which some bytes are addressable and others are not. When yes, such loads do not produce an address error. Instead, loaded bytes originating from illegal addresses are marked as uninitialised, and those corresponding to legal addresses are handled in the normal way. When no, loads from partially invalid addresses are treated the same as loads from completely invalid addresses: an illegal-address error is issued, and the resulting bytes are marked as initialised. Note that code that behaves in this way is in violation of the ISO C/C++ standards, and should be considered broken. If at all possible, such code should be fixed. This option should be used only as a last resort. Reply at: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/valgrind/+bug/852760/comments/36 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ On 2015-02-17T15:09:05+00:00 Kamil wrote: (In reply to Mark Wielaard from comment #16) > Note the issue is really in libidn and the reproducer needs libidn-devel > (and libidn-debuginfo) installed. Thanks for the reply! I am moving the component back to libidn... $ rpm -aq libidn\* | sort -V libidn2-0.10-1.fc21.x86_64 libidn2-devel-0.10-1.fc21.x86_64 libidn-1.28-5.fc21.x86_64 libidn-debuginfo-1.28-5.fc21.x86_64 libidn-devel-1.28-5.fc21.x86_64 Reply at: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/valgrind/+bug/852760/comments/37 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ On 2015-02-17T15:18:29+00:00 Miroslav wrote: I don't see how is this a libidn problem, the code just calls strlen() on a properly allocated buffer. Either it's a bug in valgrind that it reports false positives or gcc generates bad code. Reply at: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/valgrind/+bug/852760/comments/38 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ On 2015-02-17T15:24:03+00:00 Mark wrote: (In reply to Miroslav Lichvar from comment #18) > I don't see how is this a libidn problem, the code just calls strlen() on a > properly allocated buffer. Either it's a bug in valgrind that it reports > false positives or gcc generates bad code. As stated in comment #16 gcc generates code that valgrind can only "prove" correct when using --partial-loads-ok=yes. The code does a multi-byte loads from addresses which are partially valid and partially invalid. See that comment or the valgrind manual for more explanation. Reply at: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/valgrind/+bug/852760/comments/39 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ On 2015-09-23T19:51:05+00:00 Mark wrote: Note that valgrind 3.11.0, which was just uploaded for f23 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2015-16525, changed the default for partial-loads-ok to yes. From the release notes: - The default value for --partial-loads-ok has been changed from "no" to "yes", so as to avoid false positive errors resulting from some kinds of vectorised loops. Reply at: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/valgrind/+bug/852760/comments/40 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ On 2015-09-23T20:43:47+00:00 Jan wrote: re [comment 20]: This sounds reasonable, thanks for the update, Mark. Btw. I hit this issue with F22 + strlen standard function in the code: > valgrind-3.10.1-9.fc22.x86_64 > gcc-5.1.1-4.fc22.x86_64 Reply at: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/valgrind/+bug/852760/comments/41 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ On 2015-09-23T20:45:50+00:00 Jan wrote: Actually not sure whether libidn is affected there as well, please adjust appropriately if needed (incl. the component?). Reply at: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/valgrind/+bug/852760/comments/42 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ On 2016-07-19T20:23:33+00:00 Fedora wrote: Fedora 22 changed to end-of-life (EOL) status on 2016-07-19. Fedora 22 is no longer maintained, which means that it will not receive any further security or bug fix updates. As a result we are closing this bug. If you can reproduce this bug against a currently maintained version of Fedora please feel free to reopen this bug against that version. If you are unable to reopen this bug, please file a new report against the current release. If you experience problems, please add a comment to this bug. Thank you for reporting this bug and we are sorry it could not be fixed. Reply at: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/valgrind/+bug/852760/comments/43 ** Changed in: valgrind (Fedora) Status: Unknown => Won't Fix ** Changed in: valgrind (Fedora) Importance: Unknown => Medium -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/852760 Title: valgrind false positives on gcc-generated string routines To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/valgrind/+bug/852760/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
