Launchpad has imported 51 comments from the remote bug at https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=444440.
If you reply to an imported comment from within Launchpad, your comment will be sent to the remote bug automatically. Read more about Launchpad's inter-bugtracker facilities at https://help.launchpad.net/InterBugTracking. ------------------------------------------------------------------------ On 2008-04-28T13:03:43+00:00 Tomasz wrote: On a Toshiba Satellite Pro U300 laptop (and others with the Pro series), there is a volume dial on the side of the laptop, which is used to control the sound volume. It works on Fedora GNOME 2.22.1, but incorrectly. Even slightest move up of the dial, moves the volume all the way up. The volume control beside the clock shows the setting is in effect, also the volume icon popup shows the volume all the way up. The same happens with even slightest move the volume dial down. It turns the volume all the way down, showing the mute sound icon beside the clock on the panel and on the popup. Aditionally the move breaks the keyboard handling. After the volume all up/down keyboard is left in a non-working state. The signalling is still on because the volume popup stil shows and disappears consistenly showing the max/mute icon. I tried to see what keycodes the volume dial sends using 'xev', but since the keayboard handling breaks during the dial move, I couldn't get much information of it. To get my keyboard working back, I need to switch to text console (Ctrl-Alt-F1) and back to graphical console (Alt-F7). Description of problem: Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): How reproducible: Steps to Reproduce: 1. 2. 3. Actual results: Expected results: Additional info: Reply at: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/udev/+bug/271706/comments/0 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ On 2008-04-28T23:51:12+00:00 Bastien wrote: First, gnome-audio has nothing to do with your problem. gnome-audio is a package with a bunch of audio files to be played when certain events occur, ie. an audio theme. As for using the dial "breaking the keyboard handling", I'm not quite sure what it means. You could try using the dial on the command-line instead, with a tool like evtest (not packaged, look for evtest.c on google), or printing whatever xev gives you back (even if you need to switch VTs to get to the result). My guess is that this Toshiba laptop needs a driver to make this button work appropriately. Reassigning to the kernel, where hopefully somebody will have the hardware to test this, and point the finger back at GNOME if it's indeed the culprit (unlikely). Reply at: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/udev/+bug/271706/comments/1 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ On 2008-04-29T07:58:46+00:00 Tomasz wrote: This is not a kernel problem. This volume dial sends normal multimedia keyboard VolumeUp and VolumeDown keypresses. But I guess with some additional keycodes. In GNOME Keyboard Shortcuts these are correctly identified as XF86AudioRaiseVolume and XF86AudioLowerVolume. Under textmode console there is no problem. Turning the volume wheel yelds some ~ characters on screen only, but the keyboard is still working. Under XOrg, once I move the volume dial, keyboard is not working anymore. Maybe it is switched to RAW mode or something? (I don't know the exact X internals). So, this is more likely XOrg/GNOME problem, not kernel. I would gladly help debugging it, but I do need some guidance. Reply at: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/udev/+bug/271706/comments/2 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ On 2008-04-29T14:59:54+00:00 Chuck wrote: Can you boot to text mode and run 'showkey -s' then turn the volume up one click, let showkey terminate and post the output? Reply at: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/udev/+bug/271706/comments/3 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ On 2008-04-29T18:44:54+00:00 Tomasz wrote: VolumeUp is: 0xe0 0xb0 0xe0 0x30 0xe0 0xb0 0xe0 0x30 0xe0 0xb0 0xe0 0x30 VolumeDown is: 0xe0 0xae 0xe0 0x2e 0xe0 0xae 0xe0 0x2e 0xe0 0xae 0xe0 0x2e Reply at: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/udev/+bug/271706/comments/4 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ On 2008-05-14T10:18:10+00:00 Bug wrote: Changing version to '9' as part of upcoming Fedora 9 GA. More information and reason for this action is here: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers/HouseKeeping Reply at: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/udev/+bug/271706/comments/5 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ On 2008-06-26T14:47:50+00:00 Tomasz wrote: Fedora 9 is out. Is anything going around this issue? Reply at: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/udev/+bug/271706/comments/6 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ On 2008-07-21T01:10:41+00:00 Peter wrote: sounds like http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/xorg/2008-June/036634.html can you run evtest [1] on the device file and move the wheel by one? this should indicate whether a key down event is being sent. [1] http://people.freedesktop.org/~whot/evtest.c Reply at: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/udev/+bug/271706/comments/7 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ On 2008-07-21T08:38:53+00:00 Bastien wrote: (In reply to comment #7) > sounds like http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/xorg/2008-June/036634.html I don't like that patch because it breaks auto-repeat for a huge number of perfectly working keyboards, and it adds policy to the X server. This should probably only be done if a certain hal property was present. Reply at: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/udev/+bug/271706/comments/8 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ On 2008-07-21T14:08:09+00:00 Tomasz wrote: After moving the wheel up by one I got the following output: Event: time 1216648995.027213, type 4 (Misc), code 4 (ScanCode), value b0 Event: time 1216648995.027232, type 1 (Key), code 115 (VolumeUp), value 0 Event: time 1216648995.027235, -------------- Report Sync ------------ Event: time 1216648995.037187, type 4 (Misc), code 4 (ScanCode), value b0 Event: time 1216648995.037198, type 1 (Key), code 115 (VolumeUp), value 1 Event: time 1216648995.037200, -------------- Report Sync ------------ Event: time 1216648995.067159, type 4 (Misc), code 4 (ScanCode), value b0 Event: time 1216648995.067170, type 1 (Key), code 115 (VolumeUp), value 0 Event: time 1216648995.067172, -------------- Report Sync ------------ Event: time 1216648995.077224, type 4 (Misc), code 4 (ScanCode), value b0 Event: time 1216648995.077232, type 1 (Key), code 115 (VolumeUp), value 1 Event: time 1216648995.077234, -------------- Report Sync ------------ Event: time 1216648995.107180, type 4 (Misc), code 4 (ScanCode), value b0 Event: time 1216648995.107189, type 1 (Key), code 115 (VolumeUp), value 0 Event: time 1216648995.107191, -------------- Report Sync ------------ Event: time 1216648995.117238, type 4 (Misc), code 4 (ScanCode), value b0 Event: time 1216648995.117245, type 1 (Key), code 115 (VolumeUp), value 1 Event: time 1216648995.117247, -------------- Report Sync ------------ Full evtest output attached. Do we have evidence, that the patch really breaks things? Reply at: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/udev/+bug/271706/comments/9 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ On 2008-07-21T14:08:49+00:00 Tomasz wrote: Created attachment 312257 evtest run output Reply at: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/udev/+bug/271706/comments/10 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ On 2008-07-21T23:53:09+00:00 Peter wrote: yep, same problem. we never get a key up event, resulting in endless key repeats by the server. (In reply to comment #8) > (In reply to comment #7) > > sounds like http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/xorg/2008-June/036634.html > > I don't like that patch because it breaks auto-repeat for a huge number of > perfectly working keyboards, and it adds policy to the X server. This should > probably only be done if a certain hal property was present. agreed. mjg59 was talking about a kernel quirk for this, this is the "correct" solution. Reply at: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/udev/+bug/271706/comments/11 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ On 2008-11-01T09:39:30+00:00 Tomasz wrote: Is someone working on the quirk? Reply at: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/udev/+bug/271706/comments/30 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ On 2008-11-05T00:51:35+00:00 Peter wrote: Reassigning to kernel, sounds like Bug 460237 (for which I have seen a patch on linux-input) has a quirk already, should be able to get one for this one too. Reply at: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/udev/+bug/271706/comments/38 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ On 2009-06-10T00:29:17+00:00 Bug wrote: This message is a reminder that Fedora 9 is nearing its end of life. Approximately 30 (thirty) days from now Fedora will stop maintaining and issuing updates for Fedora 9. It is Fedora's policy to close all bug reports from releases that are no longer maintained. At that time this bug will be closed as WONTFIX if it remains open with a Fedora 'version' of '9'. Package Maintainer: If you wish for this bug to remain open because you plan to fix it in a currently maintained version, simply change the 'version' to a later Fedora version prior to Fedora 9's end of life. Bug Reporter: Thank you for reporting this issue and we are sorry that we may not be able to fix it before Fedora 9 is end of life. If you would still like to see this bug fixed and are able to reproduce it against a later version of Fedora please change the 'version' of this bug to the applicable version. If you are unable to change the version, please add a comment here and someone will do it for you. Although we aim to fix as many bugs as possible during every release's lifetime, sometimes those efforts are overtaken by events. Often a more recent Fedora release includes newer upstream software that fixes bugs or makes them obsolete. The process we are following is described here: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers/HouseKeeping Reply at: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/udev/+bug/271706/comments/65 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ On 2009-07-14T18:04:38+00:00 Bug wrote: Fedora 9 changed to end-of-life (EOL) status on 2009-07-10. Fedora 9 is no longer maintained, which means that it will not receive any further security or bug fix updates. As a result we are closing this bug. If you can reproduce this bug against a currently maintained version of Fedora please feel free to reopen this bug against that version. Thank you for reporting this bug and we are sorry it could not be fixed. Reply at: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/udev/+bug/271706/comments/76 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ On 2009-07-27T15:36:39+00:00 Bastien wrote: *** Bug 511408 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** Reply at: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/udev/+bug/271706/comments/78 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ On 2009-07-27T15:44:15+00:00 Dan wrote: Can this bug be reopened, since it happens on Fedora 11 still? I don't see how to reopen the bug. Reply at: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/udev/+bug/271706/comments/79 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ On 2010-04-27T12:01:15+00:00 Bug wrote: This message is a reminder that Fedora 11 is nearing its end of life. Approximately 30 (thirty) days from now Fedora will stop maintaining and issuing updates for Fedora 11. It is Fedora's policy to close all bug reports from releases that are no longer maintained. At that time this bug will be closed as WONTFIX if it remains open with a Fedora 'version' of '11'. Package Maintainer: If you wish for this bug to remain open because you plan to fix it in a currently maintained version, simply change the 'version' to a later Fedora version prior to Fedora 11's end of life. Bug Reporter: Thank you for reporting this issue and we are sorry that we may not be able to fix it before Fedora 11 is end of life. If you would still like to see this bug fixed and are able to reproduce it against a later version of Fedora please change the 'version' of this bug to the applicable version. If you are unable to change the version, please add a comment here and someone will do it for you. Although we aim to fix as many bugs as possible during every release's lifetime, sometimes those efforts are overtaken by events. Often a more recent Fedora release includes newer upstream software that fixes bugs or makes them obsolete. The process we are following is described here: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers/HouseKeeping Reply at: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/udev/+bug/271706/comments/110 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ On 2010-06-28T10:35:30+00:00 Bug wrote: Fedora 11 changed to end-of-life (EOL) status on 2010-06-25. Fedora 11 is no longer maintained, which means that it will not receive any further security or bug fix updates. As a result we are closing this bug. If you can reproduce this bug against a currently maintained version of Fedora please feel free to reopen this bug against that version. Thank you for reporting this bug and we are sorry it could not be fixed. Reply at: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/udev/+bug/271706/comments/116 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ On 2010-07-23T12:38:37+00:00 Martin wrote: This was recently fixed in udev: http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/hotplug/udev.git;a=commit;h=310f2896eb04b4aa2fe5241f7cf0590852adb2fe Reply at: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/udev/+bug/271706/comments/120 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ On 2010-07-23T13:11:39+00:00 Bastien wrote: Thanks for the notice Martin. Reply at: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/udev/+bug/271706/comments/123 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ On 2010-07-23T15:25:03+00:00 Chuck wrote: Fedora kernel maintainers already get copies of all mail for kernel- maint@ Reply at: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/udev/+bug/271706/comments/124 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ On 2010-09-21T14:39:57+00:00 Fedora wrote: udev-145-22.fc12 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 12. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/udev-145-22.fc12 Reply at: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/udev/+bug/271706/comments/131 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ On 2010-09-22T00:34:28+00:00 Fedora wrote: udev-145-22.fc12 has been pushed to the Fedora 12 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update udev'. You can provide feedback for this update here: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/udev-145-22.fc12 Reply at: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/udev/+bug/271706/comments/132 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ On 2010-11-04T11:56:08+00:00 Bug wrote: This message is a reminder that Fedora 12 is nearing its end of life. Approximately 30 (thirty) days from now Fedora will stop maintaining and issuing updates for Fedora 12. It is Fedora's policy to close all bug reports from releases that are no longer maintained. At that time this bug will be closed as WONTFIX if it remains open with a Fedora 'version' of '12'. Package Maintainer: If you wish for this bug to remain open because you plan to fix it in a currently maintained version, simply change the 'version' to a later Fedora version prior to Fedora 12's end of life. Bug Reporter: Thank you for reporting this issue and we are sorry that we may not be able to fix it before Fedora 12 is end of life. If you would still like to see this bug fixed and are able to reproduce it against a later version of Fedora please change the 'version' of this bug to the applicable version. If you are unable to change the version, please add a comment here and someone will do it for you. Although we aim to fix as many bugs as possible during every release's lifetime, sometimes those efforts are overtaken by events. Often a more recent Fedora release includes newer upstream software that fixes bugs or makes them obsolete. The process we are following is described here: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers/HouseKeeping Reply at: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/udev/+bug/271706/comments/140 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ On 2010-12-05T07:11:17+00:00 Bug wrote: Fedora 12 changed to end-of-life (EOL) status on 2010-12-02. Fedora 12 is no longer maintained, which means that it will not receive any further security or bug fix updates. As a result we are closing this bug. If you can reproduce this bug against a currently maintained version of Fedora please feel free to reopen this bug against that version. Thank you for reporting this bug and we are sorry it could not be fixed. Reply at: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/udev/+bug/271706/comments/141 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ On 2011-01-23T16:25:22+00:00 Pavel wrote: I am afraid this bug is still present in Fedora 13 and will test with Fedora 14. Cheers, Pavel Reply at: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/udev/+bug/271706/comments/142 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ On 2011-04-21T14:21:59+00:00 Karel wrote: reopening as per comment #27 - please retest if this was really fixed by the udev-145-22.fc12 update (and there's no regression in newer Fedora) then please close this bug properly, WONTFIX really isn't appropriate for a bug that has been fixed ... Reply at: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/udev/+bug/271706/comments/143 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ On 2011-06-02T18:32:50+00:00 Bug wrote: This message is a reminder that Fedora 13 is nearing its end of life. Approximately 30 (thirty) days from now Fedora will stop maintaining and issuing updates for Fedora 13. It is Fedora's policy to close all bug reports from releases that are no longer maintained. At that time this bug will be closed as WONTFIX if it remains open with a Fedora 'version' of '13'. Package Maintainer: If you wish for this bug to remain open because you plan to fix it in a currently maintained version, simply change the 'version' to a later Fedora version prior to Fedora 13's end of life. Bug Reporter: Thank you for reporting this issue and we are sorry that we may not be able to fix it before Fedora 13 is end of life. If you would still like to see this bug fixed and are able to reproduce it against a later version of Fedora please change the 'version' of this bug to the applicable version. If you are unable to change the version, please add a comment here and someone will do it for you. Although we aim to fix as many bugs as possible during every release's lifetime, sometimes those efforts are overtaken by events. Often a more recent Fedora release includes newer upstream software that fixes bugs or makes them obsolete. The process we are following is described here: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers/HouseKeeping Reply at: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/udev/+bug/271706/comments/144 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ On 2011-06-27T13:58:02+00:00 Bug wrote: Fedora 13 changed to end-of-life (EOL) status on 2011-06-25. Fedora 13 is no longer maintained, which means that it will not receive any further security or bug fix updates. As a result we are closing this bug. If you can reproduce this bug against a currently maintained version of Fedora please feel free to reopen this bug against that version. Thank you for reporting this bug and we are sorry it could not be fixed. Reply at: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/udev/+bug/271706/comments/145 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ On 2011-06-28T22:02:31+00:00 Pavel wrote: I have just tested it on Fedora 15 and the bug is still present. Reply at: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/udev/+bug/271706/comments/146 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ On 2011-06-29T09:18:03+00:00 Karel wrote: (In reply to comment #31) > I have just tested it on Fedora 15 and the bug is still present. reopening then if the patch mentioned in comment #20 doesn't fix the issue then we have a problem ... please check that you have the appropriate rule in place - # grep TOSHIBA /lib/udev/rules.d/95-keyboard-force-release.rules ENV{DMI_VENDOR}=="TOSHIBA", ATTR{[dmi/id]product_name}=="Satellite U300|Satellite Pro U300|Satellite U305|SATELLITE U500", RUN+="keyboard- force-release.sh $devpath common-volume-keys" and does your model name match one of the product names listed? Reply at: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/udev/+bug/271706/comments/147 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ On 2011-06-29T18:10:26+00:00 Pavel wrote: Thanks for your reply... grep TOSHIBA /lib/udev/rules.d/95-keyboard-force-release.rules ENV{DMI_VENDOR}=="TOSHIBA", ATTR{[dmi/id]product_name}=="Satellite U300|Satellite Pro U300|Satellite U305|SATELLITE U500", RUN+="keyboard-force-release.sh $devpath common-volume-keys" I don't know where is keyboard-force-release.sh My notebook is Toshiba Satellite u300-13u. Reply at: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/udev/+bug/271706/comments/148 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ On 2011-06-30T08:06:10+00:00 Martin wrote: Pavel, it seems you have a slightly different model than the one that was originally reported here. I now made the name matches more liberal, which sohuld also catch your model: http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/hotplug/udev.git;a=commit;h=daa42554ea1f3bc861805a753d2dd07c1c5db743 Reply at: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/udev/+bug/271706/comments/149 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ On 2011-06-30T08:57:37+00:00 Karel wrote: Pavle, would you mind patching your udev rules with Martin's update to test it? as for the script, the full path is /lib/udev/keyboard-force-release.sh and it is included in udev package Reply at: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/udev/+bug/271706/comments/150 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ On 2011-06-30T21:52:10+00:00 Pavel wrote: I hand-applied the patch. Is there any other way to test it than reboot? Reply at: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/udev/+bug/271706/comments/151 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ On 2011-07-01T06:34:24+00:00 Martin wrote: Yes, you can run udevadm trigger --subsystem-match=input as root. Reply at: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/udev/+bug/271706/comments/152 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ On 2011-07-01T09:25:23+00:00 Pavel wrote: The patch did *not* help. Reply at: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/udev/+bug/271706/comments/153 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ On 2011-07-01T09:27:09+00:00 Pavel wrote: Created attachment 510827 /sys/devices/virtual/dmi/id/ This archive contains my /sys/devices/virtual/dmi/id/. I hope it helps. Reply at: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/udev/+bug/271706/comments/154 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ On 2011-07-01T10:44:21+00:00 Martin wrote: Pavel, something seems to have gone wrong there: $ cat product_version �������������������������������� can you please give me the output of cat /sys/class/dmi/id/product_name ? Does it say something reasonable like "Satellite u300" or just the broken garbage that your tarball has? Reply at: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/udev/+bug/271706/comments/155 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ On 2011-07-01T19:51:02+00:00 Pavel wrote: Martin, it is as broken as you see it in the tarball. Binary garbage full of FF bytes. Reply at: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/udev/+bug/271706/comments/156 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ On 2011-07-01T20:07:11+00:00 Martin wrote: Pavel, thanks for checking. I'm afraid there's no generic way to fix this in the rules then :/ You can fix it locally by creating a file /etc/udev/rules.d/95-keyboard.rules with --------------------- 8< ------------------ ACTION=="remove", GOTO="force_release_end" SUBSYSTEM!="serio", GOTO="force_release_end" KERNEL!="serio*", GOTO="force_release_end" DRIVER!="atkbd", GOTO="force_release_end" ENV{DMI_VENDOR}="$attr{[dmi/id]sys_vendor}" ENV{DMI_VENDOR}=="TOSHIBA", RUN+="keyboard-force-release.sh $devpath common-volume-keys" --------------------- 8< ------------------ Reply at: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/udev/+bug/271706/comments/157 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ On 2011-07-01T20:07:41+00:00 Martin wrote: Whoops, sorry. You need to append a line LABEL="force_release_end" Reply at: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/udev/+bug/271706/comments/158 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ On 2011-07-01T20:26:41+00:00 Pavel wrote: Trying: # cat /etc/udev/rules.d/95-keyboard.rules ACTION=="remove", GOTO="force_release_end" SUBSYSTEM!="serio", GOTO="force_release_end" KERNEL!="serio*", GOTO="force_release_end" DRIVER!="atkbd", GOTO="force_release_end" ENV{DMI_VENDOR}="$attr{[dmi/id]sys_vendor}" ENV{DMI_VENDOR}=="TOSHIBA", RUN+="keyboard-force-release.sh $devpath common-volume-keys" LABEL="force_release_end" It did not help. Unfortunately I don't understand it enough to debug. I've been using fedora for a long time and I learned not to touch the wheel. But I'm still very curious about fixing this. To learn a bit more about udev, if not for anything else. Reply at: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/udev/+bug/271706/comments/159 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ On 2011-09-09T00:56:50+00:00 Pavel wrote: For me, gnome-shell doesn't get confused anymore. Maybe because of the fix above, maybe not, I don't actually know. I'll test on a fresh F16 install when it's out. Reply at: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/udev/+bug/271706/comments/160 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ On 2011-10-20T16:09:27+00:00 Fedora wrote: This package has changed ownership in the Fedora Package Database. Reassigning to the new owner of this component. Reply at: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/udev/+bug/271706/comments/161 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ On 2011-10-20T16:11:41+00:00 Fedora wrote: This package has changed ownership in the Fedora Package Database. Reassigning to the new owner of this component. Reply at: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/udev/+bug/271706/comments/162 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ On 2011-10-20T16:13:28+00:00 Fedora wrote: This package has changed ownership in the Fedora Package Database. Reassigning to the new owner of this component. Reply at: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/udev/+bug/271706/comments/163 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ On 2011-10-20T16:17:54+00:00 Fedora wrote: This package has changed ownership in the Fedora Package Database. Reassigning to the new owner of this component. Reply at: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/udev/+bug/271706/comments/164 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ On 2012-08-07T20:18:27+00:00 Fedora wrote: This message is a notice that Fedora 15 is now at end of life. Fedora has stopped maintaining and issuing updates for Fedora 15. It is Fedora's policy to close all bug reports from releases that are no longer maintained. At this time, all open bugs with a Fedora 'version' of '15' have been closed as WONTFIX. (Please note: Our normal process is to give advanced warning of this occurring, but we forgot to do that. A thousand apologies.) Package Maintainer: If you wish for this bug to remain open because you plan to fix it in a currently maintained version, feel free to reopen this bug and simply change the 'version' to a later Fedora version. Bug Reporter: Thank you for reporting this issue and we are sorry that we were unable to fix it before Fedora 15 reached end of life. If you would still like to see this bug fixed and are able to reproduce it against a later version of Fedora, you are encouraged to click on "Clone This Bug" (top right of this page) and open it against that version of Fedora. Although we aim to fix as many bugs as possible during every release's lifetime, sometimes those efforts are overtaken by events. Often a more recent Fedora release includes newer upstream software that fixes bugs or makes them obsolete. The process we are following is described here: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers/HouseKeeping Reply at: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/udev/+bug/271706/comments/165 ** Changed in: linux (Fedora) Status: In Progress => Won't Fix ** Changed in: linux (Fedora) Importance: Unknown => Low -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/271706 Title: Toshiba Satellite U300 volume wheel sticking To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/evdev/+bug/271706/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
