I appreciate the need to move charms to the network-get --primary- address charm hook tool to support use of network spaces, but I still feel that there might be a 'undefined behaviour' use case in this code path.
If a user does not bind a relation or extra-binding, then what gets returned from network-get --primary-address <relation-name>? Does the unbound, default, behaviour mimic what unit-get private-address does? ** Package changed: juju-core (Ubuntu) => juju (Ubuntu) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1657305 Title: percona cluster getting wrong private ip To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/opnfv/+bug/1657305/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
