> IMPORTANT: There is a known regression that may be seen by
> users of `lxc exec`. See bug #1641243 for details.
I don't see any mention of an lxc exec regression in bug #1641243.
Please explain here what the known regression is, and why this is
thought to be acceptable in an SRU.
Please also elaborate why support for loading apparmor profiles in a
14.04 container on a 16.04 host is an appropriate rationale for an SRU.
Is this related to supporting snappy inside a 14.04 container? I
understand the argument for supporting snappy on a 14.04 host; I'm less
clear on the rationale for users to want snappy support in a 14.04 lxd
container, as opposed to simply spinning up a 16.04 lxd container to get
snappy support.
** Changed in: apparmor (Ubuntu Trusty)
Status: In Progress => Incomplete
** Changed in: upstart (Ubuntu Trusty)
Status: In Progress => Incomplete
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1628285
Title:
apparmor should be allowed to start in containers
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/apparmor/+bug/1628285/+subscriptions
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
