We already do that today for existing interfaces. But I wonder if we should open up a slightly wider door for name registration on the session bus specifically (IOW, not system session, not communication), so that applications can run even if they don't bother about interfaces. This would unblock applications from being published confined, and it would not break the interface model because to communicate they'd still an interface.
-- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1590679 Title: Apps can't own session bus names (unity7 interface) To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/snappy/+bug/1590679/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
