On Fri, 6 May 2016, Joseph Salisbury wrote:
> A kernel bug report was opened against Ubuntu [0].  After a kernel
> bisect, it was found that reverting the following commit resolved this bug:
> 
> commit 1f12e32f4cd5243ae46d8b933181be0d022c6793
> Author: Thomas Gleixner <t...@linutronix.de>
> Date:   Mon Feb 22 22:19:15 2016 +0000
> 
>     x86/topology: Create logical package id
> 
> To build successfully with this commit reverted, I also had to revert
> commits: e7ee3e8,2d4de83,87f01cc and 33c3cc7.
> 
> The regression was introduced as of v4.6-rc1.
>     
> I was hoping to get your feedback, since you are the patch author.  Do
> you think gathering any additional data will help diagnose this issue,
> or would it be best to submit a revert request?

Yuck. That dies with a divide error. And that looks like XEN is supplying crap
data in the CPUID.

Does the patch below cure the issue?

Thanks,

        tglx

8<---------------

--- a/arch/x86/kernel/smpboot.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/smpboot.c
@@ -332,6 +332,11 @@ static void __init smp_init_package_map(
         * primary cores.
         */
        ncpus = boot_cpu_data.x86_max_cores;
+       if (!ncpus) {
+               pr_warn("x86_max_cores == zero !?!?");
+               ncpus = 1;
+       }
+
        __max_logical_packages = DIV_ROUND_UP(total_cpus, ncpus);
 
        /*

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1397880

Title:
  [Feature] Memory Bandwidth Monitoring

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/intel/+bug/1397880/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

Reply via email to