The test case suggests a change to 'Ubuntu Mono', but the
'Ubuntu_0.831.zip' I have here doesn't have any Ubuntu Mono (nor source,
nor changelog, nor scripting, nor test cases, nor any contextual
information). I can see:
2016-01-04 11:31 Zip file (repacked today?)
2015-12-04 10:55 .ttfs
2015-12-04 10:53:12..10:53:39, internal timestamps (three-second intervals)
The two positive takeaways are that the version debug glyph shows 0.831,
and from the close-interval timestamps we can deduce that the change(s)
were made in an automated fashion. The question remains *what those
changes are*.
We can see eg:
$ otfinfo -s {,/usr/share/fonts/truetype/ubuntu-font-
family/}Ubuntu-R.ttf
That the 0.84 files already out in the real world have flags indicating
'Hebrew' and 'Default', which these don't. Since these support less
than than the higher-numbered version out there, it remains:
* What are these files for. What is their purpose, what is supposed to be
tested.
* Are they even targetted for distribution. If so what are we supposed to do
with them when they have a lower version number and less functionality.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1512111
Title:
"Ubuntu Light" font has heavier weight than "Ubuntu"
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/hundredpapercuts/+bug/1512111/+subscriptions
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
