On Mon, Oct 26, 2015 at 07:52:11PM -0000, Björn Michaelsen wrote:
> I just looked if we can do a direct sync, but stopped when I found that
> Debian wasnt building hunspell-sv-se. I wouldnt merge if there is not
> more to it, rather just readd those on top of Debian package ..
debian's lo-dicts builds hunspell-sv, which conflicts with
hunspell-sv-se, which is built by another source package, also in
ubuntu.
Since I'm the debian maintainer of lo-dicts please just ask if you
notice something weird. Please also note that just syncing might not be
that wise. replaces/conflicts might be very well needed due to
myspell-${lang} → hunspell-${lang} transition or a lot of other reasons.
I'm up for adding those (versioned) conflicts directly in the debian
package if they don't clash with somthing)
--
regards,
Mattia Rizzolo
GPG Key: 66AE 2B4A FCCF 3F52 DA18 4D18 4B04 3FCD B944 4540 .''`.
more about me: http://mapreri.org : :' :
Launchpad user: https://launchpad.net/~mapreri `. `'`
Debian QA page: https://qa.debian.org/developer.php?login=mattia `-
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1510198
Title:
Rebase/Reimplement Ubuntu changes upon Debian (possibly upstream them)
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libreoffice-dictionaries/+bug/1510198/+subscriptions
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
