> Why should it be a blocker now that we are asking for ibmpmlinux to be installed to /opt instead?
PMLinux has only one menu command for all of the user interfaces, "/var/perf/pm/config.PMLnx", which has a symbol link at /usr/sbin/config.PMLnx for root working well without $PATH setting. Now, as per Mathieu's request "putting *everything* under /opt" " to fulfill FHS standard, we have to move that public link into /opt/sbin, which will ruin the interface access, so does PMLinux man help if we also relocate PMLinux.8.gz from /usr/share/man to /opt/man. > Isn't it preferrable to have this software in the partner archive, with or > without /opt/bin path integration, than to not have it in the archive? Because Ubuntu is not ready for basic /opt support, what I hope is Ubuntu team still allows PMLinux continue to use /usr/sbin and /usr/share/man. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1448092 Title: [needs-packaging] ibmpmlinux To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+bug/1448092/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
