On Sat, 19 Sep 2015, Till Kamppeter wrote: > What is happening here is the following. With a standard Ubuntu Desktop > installation Ghostscript is not able to render the file attached to this > bug report. If one installs only the texlive-lang-cjk and nothing more > (therefore "--no-install-recommends"), Ghostscript remders the attached > file correctly. > > This leads to the conclusion that adding the files contained in texlive- > lang-cjk to the system fixes Ghostscript's problem to render the > attached file.
But which *added* file creates the problem? I am slightly surprised about this, and can only possible blame it on latex-cjk as the other packages do not do anything related to ghostscript and do not add fonts to the general search path. Can you please check what file is read by gs that creates the problem? Furthermore, *why* do you want gs recommends texlive-lang-cjk? What do you need as gs from it? Norbert ------------------------------------------------------------------------ PREINING, Norbert http://www.preining.info JAIST, Japan TeX Live & Debian Developer GPG: 0x860CDC13 fp: F7D8 A928 26E3 16A1 9FA0 ACF0 6CAC A448 860C DC13 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1449875 Title: ghostscript fails on some EPS files To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ghostscript/+bug/1449875/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
