On 2015-04-29 01:07:19, Scott Kitterman wrote: > On Tuesday, April 28, 2015 05:06:57 PM you wrote: > > On 2015-04-28 00:16:15, Scott Kitterman wrote: > > > On Monday, April 27, 2015 10:14:47 PM you wrote: > > > > Hi Jonathan (and Scott) - This update fixes a security issue so it > > > > should go through the -security sponsoring process rather than the SRU > > > > process. The Security Team will get it sponsored to the security pocket > > > > > > > once these steps are followed: > > > I know for security it's supposed to be built against security and not > > > proposed/updates, but this close to release it's essentially the same > > > thing. Can you just pocket copy this to security? > > > > We can do that in this case but it definitely isn't something that we > > should make a habit of. > > > > Just to be clear, do you want us to copy it from -proposed to -security > > now or wait until the SRU process completes and copy it from -updates to > > -security at that time? > > Your call on when. It's the upstream fix, so I'm confident it's correct, but > we > can get someone to do verification first if you prefer.
Verification is always a good thing. We can wait for that. Thanks! -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to quassel in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1448911 Title: Execute initDbSession() on DB reconnects To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/quassel/+bug/1448911/+subscriptions -- kubuntu-bugs mailing list kubuntu-b...@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/kubuntu-bugs
