I've read the comments defending the position that the -t parameter
should be ignored. I still don't understand. I'm dumbfounded.

I can honestly see no harm whatsoever in adding support for  it.

There are plenty of use cases for which the default time out does not
work well at all. The current implementation violates the spec. Why are
you so stubborn?

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/390508

Title:
  notifyOSD ignores the expire timeout parameter

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/hundredpapercuts/+bug/390508/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

Reply via email to