I've read the comments defending the position that the -t parameter should be ignored. I still don't understand. I'm dumbfounded.
I can honestly see no harm whatsoever in adding support for it. There are plenty of use cases for which the default time out does not work well at all. The current implementation violates the spec. Why are you so stubborn? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/390508 Title: notifyOSD ignores the expire timeout parameter To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/hundredpapercuts/+bug/390508/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
