In my situation I've got for example the following;

eth0 (root device)
eth0.100 (vlan 100)
eth0.1024 (vlan 1024)


To even get ISC to start, I have to assign a scope to the eth0 device.  It 
refuses to use either VLAN interface as a valid interface.   If I place a  DHCP 
pool and an IP of 192.168.2.0/24 on the eth0 device, ISC will start.  Creating 
pools for 192.168.3.0 and 192.168.4.0 on the VLANS is fine, however if a device 
on one of the VLAN's requests DHCP, you can see the request packets arrive on 
both eth0 and eth0.100 for instance, and it gets answered on eth0.  

If you don't give an IP to eth0, ISC will completely refuse to start
saying there's no adapters, despite having static IP's on the eth0.100
and eth0.1024.

You would expect the packets to arrive on the root device, but
apparently ISC will only talk on the root device.

I've confirmed that setting a static IP for a device on the VLAN works
perfectly - sending it's packets in on the VLAN tagged virtual
interface.  It's just that ISC won't look on those interfaces for where
to apply a scope.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1167614

Title:
  DHCP server incorrectly handling VLAN tagged packets

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/isc-dhcp/+bug/1167614/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

Reply via email to