Le 25/01/2015 11:35, kcle...@users.sourceforge.net a écrit : > Hi Didier, > Hey Qichang
> >> - the version makes people think that this package is available in debian, >> which is not the case. Please reference it as 0.5.390-0ubuntuX >> (where -0 means "this version wasn't in debian" and ubuntuX == ubuntu+number >> as you did previously. > However, when I looked at the changeling, it has this order: > > cryptote (0.5.390-1ubuntu3) vivid; urgency=low (the one you > inspected last time in my ppa) > * Fixing compilation errors in secmem.h by explicitly naming parent class > -- Qichang Liang <kcle...@users.sourceforge.net> Thu, 25 Dec 2014 > 01:23:30 +1300 > > cryptote (0.5.390-1ubuntu2) lucid; urgency=medium > * Adding correct build dependencies > -- Timo Bingmann <r...@idlebox.net> Fri, 18 Oct 2013 21:26:03 +0200 > > cryptote (0.5.390-1ubuntu1) lucid; urgency=medium > * First public upstream beta release 0.5.390 > -- Timo Bingmann <r...@idlebox.net> Mon, 3 Aug 2009 23:03:03 +0200 > > cryptote (0.0.366-1ubuntu1) lucid; urgency=medium > * Upstream beta release 0.0.366 > -- Timo Bingmann <r...@idlebox.net> Mon, 9 Feb 2009 13:59:15 +0000 > > cryptote (0.0.330-1ubuntu1) lucid; urgency=low > * Upstream beta release 0.0.330 > -- Timo Bingmann <r...@idlebox.net> Tue, 29 Jul 2008 19:39:15 +0000 > > cryptote (0.0.259-1ubuntu1) lucid; urgency=low > * Upstream beta release 0.0.259 > -- Timo Bingmann <r...@idlebox.net> Tue, 22 Jul 2008 17:20:25 +0200 > > Though none of the previous versions were publicly released. > > So for the current version, should I use: > > cryptote (0.5.390-0ubuntu3) > > or > > cryptote (0.5.390-0ubuntu1) > > I am very confused > As you already have to downgrade the version compared to the ppa, please use: 0.5.390-0ubuntu1. >> - debian/rules: there are some lintian errors on it, make clean doesn't >> really clean the package and have some rules missing: >> W: cryptote source: debian-rules-ignores-make-clean-error line 46 >> W: cryptote source: debian-rules-missing-recommended-target build-indep >> W: cryptote source: debian-rules-missing-recommended-target build-arch >> Please, consider here as well to use debhelper 9 as the rules will be way >> easier. >> >> debian/rules would be simply something like: >> #!/usr/bin/make -f >> >> #DH_VERBOSE=1 >> >> %: >> dh $@ >> >> and from that, you can read some debhelper documentation if you need to >> override some default parameters. > I am going to look into that. I think there is only one binary > package, so there should not be build-indep stuff. Keep me posted once you have done a build with this new debian/rules! > > > >> * debian/menu is not in use in ubuntu, if you don't intend to upload that >> package to debian, please remove it. > Here is another problem: I want to get cryptote into 15.04 as soon as > possible, but I don't rule out uploading that package in the future. > So what should I do with debian/menu? You will have to reupload a version to debian anyway, so I would say, include a .menu once you are uploading that to Debian NEW again? (and we'll then just sync it up from Debian in Ubuntu) > > And alternatively, do you have power to sponsor new Debian packages? Unfortunately, not, I'm not a debian FTP master, sorry :/ Thanks for your work! Cheers, Didier -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1413380 Title: [needs-packaging] cryptote needs packaging To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+bug/1413380/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
