> Because Chromium developers want their browser to be free from digital restrictions, this bug will stay unfixed for Ubuntu too.
What difference does that make? It's not "their browser." Chromium is free software, and Ubuntu can patch it however it pleases. What would serve users better: to be able to use this plugin in Chromium, or to have no choice but to use the Google-built Chrome package and its proprietary code? The answer to that question is clear, and therefore the right thing to do is also clear: apply a patch to Chromium in Ubuntu when a patch becomes available. It makes no sense to WONTFIX this bug. WONTFIX is an anti-user attitude that doesn't belong in Ubuntu or any other free software Linux distro. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1371274 Title: Unable to use the widevine plugin with chromium To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/chromium-browser/+bug/1371274/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
