This diff should fix both the sudo and the non-sudo case: In the sudo case the empty file creates if-modified-since (I-M-S) hits that are newer than the version on the server so no metarelease file is downloaded. Empty files now get simply removed.
In the non-sudo case both the "meta-release" and the "meta-release- development" file are mapped onto the same local filename. This confuses the i-m-s mechanism. The metarelease filename now will be build based on the actual download filename. Cheers, Michael ** Attachment added: "Debdiff that fixes the issue" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/9202688/update-manager_0.59.24.debdiff ** Changed in: update-manager (Ubuntu Feisty) Importance: Undecided => Medium Assignee: (unassigned) => Michael Vogt Status: New => In Progress -- update-manager cannot find meta-release info https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/127263 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
