Think the original report queried whether it could be cached with the comment ‘or the futile accesses should be removed’ to avoid the noise in traces; is the state of the file intended to change ld behaviour during load, should it?
-- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/558571 Title: /etc/ld.so.nohwcap missing To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/glibc/+bug/558571/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
