Am 04.06.2014 15:51, schrieb btreecat: > Matthias Klose, coming from a distro who does a lot less mucking about > with upstream packages, having deafult language behavior broken infavor > of idealistic guidlines is just plain bad for UX.
there is nothing broken in "default language behaviour". There is a binary missing which enables you to create a virtual environment. > Spin it how you want to but shiping broken packages means some one just > means someone spent the time trying to make the package conform (and I > agree with Ivo, why is this just now an issue when virtualenv was > shipping "incorrectly" before.) but failed to take the time to make it > actually work as expected. It happens, but it should not happen when it > does not need to. This was clearly an idealistic need rather than > technical need. Thats why I say "needlessly." shipping virtualenv in such a way is a mistake, which only was discovered after the release. Knowingly shipping something which we cannot ship makes things worse. The issue was known way before the release, and it was promised to get fixed before the release (which didn't happen). So the next time if you are interested in a fix included in a release, please help understanding and fixing these issues. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1290847 Title: pyvenv fails due to mising ensurepip module To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/python3-defaults/+bug/1290847/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
