Linbit's Lars Ellenberg confirmed on the ML that adding /lib/drbd to the path won't fix drbdsetup in all cases: drbdsetup-83 has to be in the same directory as the drbdsetup, and it also applies to drbdadmin.
On Tue, Apr 22, 2014 at 01:56:16PM +0200, Lionel Sausin wrote: > (...) > Is the correct fix to add a symlink from /lib/drbd/drbdsetup-83 to > /sbin, or should drbdsetup be patched to search in /lib/drbd too? "Correct" is whatever works for you. As long as you know what version you are using, use the matching tools. Note that using explicit path (anything with a '/' in it) on drbdadm or drbdsetup causes them to expect the respective "legacy" binary at that same path, beneath the current executable. (on purpose). So if you want to say /sbin/drbdsetup, and expect that to be able to execvp drbdsetup-83, then yes, you have to make that accesible under /sbin/drbdsetup-83, adding it to the PATH will not be good enough. Also, as a heads up, we are in the process on splitting out the DRBD userland, providing the "grand unified drbd utils", so this will all change again within the next few weeks/month. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1185756 Title: drbd8-utils not compatible with linux-lts-raring kernel in 12.04 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/drbd8/+bug/1185756/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
