Specification updated.
<https://wiki.ubuntu.com/SystemSettings?action=diff&rev2=54&rev1=53>

It's not clear to me how much of the feedback I've specified should be
implemented in the page stack component in general, and how much belongs
in System Settings in particular.

** Changed in: ubuntu-system-settings (Ubuntu)
       Status: In Progress => Triaged

** Changed in: ubuntu-system-settings (Ubuntu)
     Assignee: Matthew Paul Thomas (mpt) => (unassigned)

** Description changed:

  When you tap on a settings section (such as "Updates") there is no
  visual feedback that the tap was recognized.  For some sections (again
  like "Updates") there is a long enough delay between tap event and
  screen changes that the user often begins to wonder if the tap was
  recognized or not.  Flashing a background highlight on the section
  icon/button when the tap happens, and before the process of loading the
  next screen begins, will assure the user that their selection was
  recognized.
+ 
+ <https://wiki.ubuntu.com/SystemSettings#navigation-feedback>: "All other 
items in the main screen should act as page stacks, regardless of whether they 
are list items (like “About this phone”) or grid items (like “Sound”). In 
particular:
+  1. When you choose an item, the item should highlight until its screen 
appears.
+  2. If that screen has not loaded within two seconds, a placeholder screen 
should appear with an empty header.
+  3. If the actual screen still has not loaded after another three seconds, a 
spinner should appear in the center of the placeholder screen."

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1239884

Title:
  No visual feedback when a settings section is selected

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-system-settings/+bug/1239884/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

Reply via email to