Thanks for the report. I'm marking this one "invalid" because libjpeg8
appears to exist only to suggest using libjpeg-turbo:
$ umt search libjpeg8
Running search command.
Ubuntu packages:
Other packages:
squeeze: 8b-1, Pocket: release, Component: main
unstable: 8d-1, Pocket: release, Component: main
wheezy: 8d-1, Pocket: release, Component: main
$ apt-cache show libjpeg8
Package: libjpeg8
Priority: optional
Section: libs
Installed-Size: 26
Maintainer: Ubuntu Developers <ubuntu-devel-disc...@lists.ubuntu.com>
Architecture: amd64
Source: libjpeg8-empty
Version: 8c-2ubuntu8
Depends: libjpeg-turbo8 (>= 1.1.90+svn722-1ubuntu6)
...
$ apt-cache show libjpeg-turbo8
Package: libjpeg-turbo8
Priority: optional
Section: libs
Installed-Size: 330
Maintainer: Ubuntu Developers <ubuntu-devel-disc...@lists.ubuntu.com>
Architecture: amd64
Source: libjpeg-turbo
Version: 1.3.0-0ubuntu1
Replaces: libjpeg8 (<< 8c-2ubuntu5)
...
If I've missed something, please let me know, but I think libjpeg6b and
libjpeg-turbo are the only source packages we need to worry about.
Thanks
** Changed in: libjpeg8 (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Invalid
** Information type changed from Private Security to Public Security
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1252913
Title:
CVE-2013-6629
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libjpeg8/+bug/1252913/+subscriptions
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
