Hi. Thanks for the good thoughts, they clarify things well. I think I'd be fine with both qtchooser not handling qdbus and binary moving away from multi-arch directory. Although the direct /usr/bin/qdbus symlink would be problematic since the executable inside qdbus-qt5 package is still called just 'qdbus' like the Qt4 version, and it should be allowed to be used.
Crucially though, I'd like to have the same solution as Debian will have, and I haven't yet had the time to bring the topic fully to them (via #debian-qt-kde @ OFTC). If I remember correctly it was very briefly thought about, mainly the first question was that why would anyone want to install/use the 32-bit versions (but of course, lack of support in qtchooser for that is still an omission). The related Debian git:s are http://anonscm.debian.org/gitweb/?p=pkg-kde/qt/qtchooser.git;a=summary , http://anonscm.debian.org/gitweb/?p=pkg-kde/qt/qttools.git;a=summary (qdbus-qt5) and http://anonscm.debian.org/gitweb/?p=pkg- kde/qt/qtbase.git;a=summary (configuration of bindir). -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1176686 Title: qtchooser does not properly work with multiarch To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/qtchooser/+bug/1176686/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
