Turning off updates in 7 so I get no updates until 8 seems like an appropriate balance between the risk of being damaged by a security violation and the risk of being damaged by a security update. If you think otherwise, quantify.
Kirk On 7/23/07, Alexander Sack <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Mon, Jul 23, 2007 at 05:07:43PM -0000, Kirk Fraser wrote: > > Again, I think the risk of not updating between Ubuntu 7 and Ubuntu 8 is > not > > significant. Therefore, perhaps you should quantify the risk if you are > > going to continue claiming it is "major." How many hours can U 7 be > > expected to run bug free with and without updates? I think that should > be > > the deciding factor for the general population of users, even though I > > understand developers must constantly update for a variety of reasons. > > its not about upgrading from 7 to 8 ... its about getting security > updates (e.g. you might read that as 7.x.x.0 to 7.x.x.1 > > - Alexander > > -- > No "No Updates" Choice > https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/125283 > You received this bug notification because you are a direct subscriber > of the bug. > -- No "No Updates" Choice https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/125283 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
