Until today I thought, that the patch worked for me, it really did probably,
and I am not so enthusiastic about tuning CPU-frequency scaling manually in
userspace. Really average users should not be bothered with this kind of stuff,
everything should work out of the box everywhere.
But in some cases, when CPUs are too energy-hungry and have exaggerated
maximum-frequencies, it makes sense probably, to limit those to 80%, because
energy-saving is higher this way than the resulting loss in performance.
So status set to 'Opinion'. Is this OK?
** Changed in: cpufreqd (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Opinion
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1051604
Title:
cpufreqd is misconfigured and does not work at all by default
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/cpufreqd/+bug/1051604/+subscriptions
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
