On 2012-12-23 09:52, Dmitry Shachnev wrote: > Hi Niels (thanks for reading our reports!), do you know what can cause > the shared-libs-non-pic-i386 error? Here's my log: > http://paste.ubuntu.com/1458988/. >
No, I am afraid I don't. It is an i386-only test, so I haven't run it for a while. There are two places things could have broken here. One is that the binary produced is now built with pic (which it shouldn't). The other issue could be that Lintian's detection is broken. Lintian 2.5.11 hasn't changed anything in the test itself or the template files used to construct the test. So if the binary is now built with pic, it could be a change in gcc (or flags exported by dpkg-buildflags, but I am not aware of any changes there). On the other hand, Lintian has seen changes in the script that parses the readelf output and loads its into memory. If this is the reason, we are probably looking at a regression introduced in 1ca9aa1 or 701e44e. If you can extract the i386 binary package produced by that test, I can have a look at fixing it. ~Niels -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1092892 Title: Merge lintian 2.5.11 from Debian experimental To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/lintian/+bug/1092892/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
