Thanks, I understand now. I didn't really understand it before, it makes 
sense. :)

On Saturday September 02 2006 4:34 pm, Paul Sladen wrote:
> Remember to quote and trim!
>
> Yes, we know Red Hat did/do this.  It also saves 60seconds off their
> boot process if you disable it (which is longer than a total Ubuntu boot
> process)... and the splash wasn't able to start until nearly the end of
> the boot---see below.
>
> In theory it's a great idea, in practice, it turns out to be mad.  There
> are bigger issues though.  'usplash' starts with in a second or two of
> boot;  there is not even a root filesystem available.  IIRC, X also
> currently needs a writable filesystem to start up.
>
> When 'usplash' starts there's not much of the machine actually available
> be able to cope with a full-system;  there were was then you' be able to
> login anyway.  :)

-- 
Usplash artwork should use dark colours to avoid flicker @ 60Hz
https://launchpad.net/bugs/58539

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

Reply via email to