Steve, I no longer have access to those systems to properly test the bug is not present.
It was a pretty easy one to check though /sbin/pam_tally2 needs to be present :) Justin On Fri, Nov 16, 2012 at 9:35 AM, Steve Langasek < steve.langa...@canonical.com> wrote: > Justin, can you please confirm that the pam_tally2 module is usable for > you with the version of pam in lucid-proposed? > > -- > You received this bug notification because you are subscribed to the bug > report. > https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/586462 > > Title: > /sbin/pam_tally2 not included in package > > Status in “pam” package in Ubuntu: > Fix Released > Status in “pam” source package in Lucid: > Fix Committed > Status in “pam” package in Debian: > Fix Released > > Bug description: > pam 1.1.1-2ubuntu2 included in Lucid does not include /sbin/pam_tally2 > which effectively breaks using pam_tally2 as you can not unlock a > locked account without this utility. This has been fixed via debian > bug #554010 and fixed in pam 1.1.1-3 in Maverick. I think this bug > warrants a SRU. > > To manage notifications about this bug go to: > https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/pam/+bug/586462/+subscriptions > -- Justin Burket C-Shift Lead NOAA/NESDIS/FCDAS 907-451-1222 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/586462 Title: /sbin/pam_tally2 not included in package To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/pam/+bug/586462/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
