I don't understand why such a silly limitation is hard coreded into a utility that other developers are supposed to use. Is there a better place we can appeal this decision? Timeouts ought to be controlled by apps and if apps abuse them, it should be brought up with the app developer. Is notification spam really such a problem that this is necessary? It seems like a solution in search of a problem that doesn't quite exist
-- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/390508 Title: notifyOSD ignores the expire timeout parameter To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/hundredpapercuts/+bug/390508/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
