I don't understand why such a silly limitation is hard coreded into a utility 
that other developers are supposed to use.  Is there a better place we can 
appeal this decision? Timeouts ought to be controlled by apps and if apps abuse 
them, it should be brought up with the app developer. Is notification spam 
really such a problem that this is necessary? 
It seems like a solution in search of a problem that doesn't quite exist

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/390508

Title:
  notifyOSD ignores the expire timeout parameter

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/hundredpapercuts/+bug/390508/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

Reply via email to