Alexander Sack wrote:

> Its not firefox's job to run java in that way ... its the job of java
> plugin to do that.

I agree; the problem is that from a users point of view the current
setup is too flaky.

> Anyway, we are working on nspluginwrapper ... and hopefully java
> 32-bit can then run on adm64 as well ... but lets see.

As I understand it nspluginwrapper can't run the java plugin at the moment;
but I can see that would be nice; I think it would also be nice for it to be 
used
on 32bit systems as the way to run Java - I just think keeping it out of 
firefox's
way is a good thing.

I think the thing that is different about java is that it can be run as a 
separate command/process
already (as KDE does) and that lets you mix and match a much wider range of 
JVMs.
Perhaps that could be implemented as a generic java plugin that was independent
of the JVM that actually got run?

(Incidentally I find nspluginwrapper useful but far from 100% reliable; I find 
after a while
it just stops running flash and I have problems with it losing clicks (#108733 
that
originally thought might be a compiz issue); but nspluginwrapper not being 
packaged
doesn't really have a place to keep it's bugs on here).

Dave

-- 
feisty+firefox+amd64+java=segfault
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/99352
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

Reply via email to