First off - please move this discussion to disc...@documentfoundation.org. To your question:
(In reply to comment #39) > This IS a nasty bug in the specification that from my point of view needs to > be > fixed. > No it's not. Did you read the spec? It is referring to svg in that particular section. Svg is not going to change, and I would strongly oppose deviating in subtle parts from that standard, to accomodate an implementation bug in _one_ ODF consumer. Please note further that with 3.5.3, we *do* correctly read old documents, and note even further that there's about a million other things that won't show up correctly in OOo 1.0, if you make it load a current ODF1.2-extended document. Get real. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/979320 Title: Particular Subtracted shapes not compatible LibO 3.4 - 3.5 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/df-libreoffice/+bug/979320/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
