Andrew:

Your argument is correct, though I read comment 44, I didn't take it too 
serious, I have to admit.
And I didn't take too much care (if any) about bug #117314 since it 
describes the same situation.

In a previous comment I complained about too little verbosity of ubuntu 
kernel devs;
apparently, they gave a comment in #117314 (Philip Lougher).

I can understand that kernel devs are too busy to comment every bug 
record, but I did expect they would comment on the first report filed on 
a particular bug, and not onto a later one (which I do regard as being 
at least interesting);

Anyway, that's the story why I didn't get the information that switching 
from ata_piix to piix was done intentionally.
However, I asked about this expicitly in comment 32 and again in comment 
65 of my own report (#116996), but nobody answered.

I will correct my bug description and add a link to 117314 in the 
description, but only later since I have no time at the moment.

thank you for bringing me up to date :)

-- 
SATA disk is in PATA mode with kernel 2.6.20-16-generic (piix claiming SATA 
controller on ICH4/ICH5 Intel chipsets)
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/116996
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

Reply via email to