(In reply to comment #5)
> Using as a WORKAROUND:
> {} newline {}
> is acceptable in the all the cases mentioned in the Description.
Not always "{} newline {}". You use {} when you need to provide the
missing operand of a binary operator. For example,
a+b_ij newline = c+d # left-hand side is missing at the second line
a+b_ij newline {} = c+d # add {} - OK
a+b_ij = newline c+d # right-hand side is missing at the first line
a+b_ij = {} newline = c+d # add {} - OK
And from my point of view, the requirement - "provide all operands,
otherwise there will be the flipped question mark" - is simply awful, it
would be a great improvement to get rid of it. newline's behavior will
be much more intuitive.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/281053
Title:
[Upstream] Math equation editor: "newline" fails after symbols
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/df-libreoffice/+bug/281053/+subscriptions
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
