I don't believe the fglrx installer failure is a bug in nvidia-common,
but rather in the interface between jockey-common and fglrx-updates.

It looks like /usr/share/jockey/handlers/fglrx.py in package jockey-
common expects the package fgrlx-updates to create a module named
'fglrx-updates', but the module generated by building that package is
actually named 'fglrx'.  See https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source
/fglrx-installer-updates/+bug/825339

Can someone who knows this code comment on this issue? How can we get
the jockey-common and fglrx-updates maintainers to agree on an
interface?

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/873058

Title:
  Jockey fail to install binary ati driver (post release) version

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/jockey/+bug/873058/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

Reply via email to