I suppose this is related to the hardware/driver in use.
Could you provide the following:
5. Always explicitly mention the full make and model of your scanner, e.g. "HP
Deskjet F4580".
6. Always provide the id, that might be determined by running lsusb and pasting
the corresponding line, that might look like "Bus 001 Device 004: ID 062a:900d
Creative Labs". Do not paste the full list of all other USB devices. Adapt for
SCSI scanners.
As for xsane and Simple Scan, I know that they are separate, but both
use sane/sane-backends/libsane, and that is separate from both. You say
that just exchanging Simple Scan on a Lucid System shows the problem, so
I conclude the problem is really in the Simple Scan code and not in
libsane.
** Changed in: simple-scan
Status: New => Incomplete
** Changed in: simple-scan (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Incomplete
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/667220
Title:
Regression from 1.0 to 2.32 - slower scan process
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/simple-scan/+bug/667220/+subscriptions
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
