I think in relation to short cuts on the desktop that it should be noted not everyone runs applications maximised. Some people even have multiple monitors and may not run maximised applications on all monitors. This is the reason why widgets, gadgets and things like conky are popular, it provides information on the desktop where people can see them. The only complication for using shortcuts on a desktop is if you have maximised applications. Also consider the situation where you have multiple workspaces and can switch between workspaces. Also you can alt tab and choose to show the desktop (also a reason why windows has (had?) a quick launcher to minimise and restore all windows on the desktop). There is also more on the desktop than just shortcuts, files and folders can be on the desktop as well.
I don't agree with replacing the desktop with the lens. What metaphor is used in this design of a lens that replaces a desktop? If such an approach were to be taken then I think you would find that more and more features available on the desktop would have to be added to the default lens to satisfy users. While it may be valid for a low resolution device like a phone, I think for other areas it would be inappropriate and restrictive. As for the lens discussion... I agree with removing the current icons, however IMHO my experience is that most recent applications and most recent files are the two most accessed items by users. After that the next items would be shortcuts to specific folders and then after that settings/administration. I think help would be last on the list. The question is, what is the purpose of the lens? A window into the computer? A quick overview/entry into what is on the computer? or is it a portal to anything you would wish to do on your computer? I think there is a danger here if too much is added to the default lens. Sure, most recent unread emails, im messages, tweets, feeds, etc could be interesting but then what are indicators for? If you go this path then there is an argument for moving settings/configuration, accounts, shutdown to the default lens as well. And then the next thing will be adding social networking services. I'm not saying this is a bad thing, I'm just questioning if this is the direction that this should be headed. Personally I feel that integration of social network services may be a good thing, but is this the right place or should it be via indicators? Should email previews be added here or should it be via an indicator. In summary, my vote would be to remove the current icons, add a summary of most recent applications and most recent files. Then I would support expert/advanced users by allowing configuration of what is shown on here and provide filters on what is shown for applications and documents (not how filters work now, but configurable filters that are remembered without taking up screen realestate, allowing a user to filter out specific applications or types of files). -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/885738 Title: Dash - Remove Dash Home shortcut icons To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ayatana-design/+bug/885738/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
