>> 1. If the guest is to have its own policy, then the host needs to create >> a new policy namespace, and then it needs to transition the guest to the >> new namespace. Guest policy will then be loaded into the new namespace, >> and will not generally* conflict with system policy. > > That's great - can the guest's namespace have constraints placed on > it by the host rules, which all domains in the guest namespace will > be subject to?
Not currently, the plan is to allow for a restrictive stack of profiles where the parent (host) rules will constrain on guests in the namespace, but its not available yet. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/876968 Title: host Apparmor rules are applied to guests in spite of guests loading new rules To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/lxc/+bug/876968/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
