Nods.  Learn something new every day.  (I am not extremely familiar with
disk bus architecture)

I don't have a performance benchmark; I was trying to watch a video and
my hard disk started cranking and the video started skipping, after a
reboot, which is when I noticed that stuff was gone.

In any case if SATA is always DMA it should always report DMA.  Also
hdparm -i should say something other than "IOCTL not here!"

http://www.webservertalk.com/archive76-2004-1-99830.html suggests that
SATA does indeed need DMA; although I can't find a definite claim that
SATA does/does not need DMA.  Relevant quote:

  "The non-DMA access of SATA drives is a kernel 2.4 issue.
   The patch applied by SuSE does not support DMA."

Also there are timings for SATA without DMA, which are a lot worse than
what I'm getting.

-- 
libata + sata == nodma
https://launchpad.net/bugs/55346

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

Reply via email to