Public bug reported:

I think that log files compression lowers the system performance on
desktop computers which have now enough disk space for storing old logs.

The "nocompress" and "compress" options of logrotate configure 2
different behaviours of logrotate.

If the log file isn't compressed,
logrotate will just rename it to something like 'log_file_name.log.1'
with quite no disk input/output.

If the log file is compressed,
logrotate will read the file, compress it and rewrite the content into a new 
file with a name like 'log_file_name.log.1.gz'.

I think that files compression is a good tradeoff only in case the
compressed files have a longer lifetime than the log files (i. e. man
pages, documentation, fonts, Debian package files, ...).

Drawbacks of log files compression :
- increases disk input/output
- increases cpu and memory usage
- increases energy consumption
- slightly decreases the disk lifetime

ProblemType: Bug
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 11.04
Package: dpkg 1.16.0~ubuntu7
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.38-11.48-generic 2.6.38.8
Uname: Linux 2.6.38-11-generic x86_64
Architecture: amd64
Date: Sat Sep  3 14:57:55 2011
InstallationMedia: Lubuntu 11.04 "Natty Narwhal" - Release amd64 (20110427)
ProcEnviron:
 LANG=fr_FR.UTF-8
 SHELL=/bin/bash
SourcePackage: dpkg
UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install)

** Affects: dpkg (Ubuntu)
     Importance: Undecided
         Status: New


** Tags: amd64 apport-bug natty

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/840317

Title:
  /etc/logrotate.d/dpkg should not have compress option

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/dpkg/+bug/840317/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

Reply via email to