if I were still interested, no your proposal is not at all adequate.

do *you* think it is?

On 30 August 2011 02:08, Matthias Klose <d...@ubuntu.com> wrote:

> sorry, lots of talk, but not any answer to my question.
>
> --
> You received this bug notification because you are subscribed to the bug
> report.
> https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/779170
>
> Title:
>  Needs porting to DCMTK 3.6
>
> Status in “odin” package in Ubuntu:
>  Confirmed
> Status in “odin” source package in Oneiric:
>  Confirmed
> Status in “odin” package in Debian:
>  Confirmed
>
> Bug description:
>  you have, for some reason, and very recently, removed the package
>  libdcmtk1 and replaced it with libdcmtk2. the maintainer is mainly
>  concerned with the ubuntu desktop, not with this sort of package as
>  far as I can see.
>
>  this means that the packages "odin" and most importantly "mitools" as
>  well as several other important medical imaging utilities have ceased
>  to function (i.e. cannot be installed due to broken dependency
>  libcmtk2 instead of required libdcmtk1).
>
>  libdcmtk is a medical imaging related package. It's basically for
>  dealing with DICOMM. It doesn't have a wider purpose in the operating
>  system than managing DICOMM sets.
>
>  I don't understand why it needed to be changed in a way that broke the
>  dependencies of half the medical imaging software in the repository.
>
>  now, you've listed this as "low priority"
>
>  Even though I'm a just scientist and not a doctor I'd consider things
>  with the words "medical imaging" in them to be very high priority,
>  compared to, say, a toolbar or a widget.
>
>  I think you'd agree actually. I need to use miconv to manipulate MRI
>  images. Since I'm doing basic science, lives are hardly at risk if I
>  hit a snag.
>
>  However. these same packages are most certainly used by biomedical
>  scientists and doctors to detect tumors and study and treat disease.
>
>  So I'd put it quite high on the list of things to fix. But it's up to
>  you.
>
>  I think just putting libdcmtk1 back would do the trick but I've not
>  traced it through. There must have been some reason to replace it but
>  too much is now broken. much of my MRI code.
>
>  the medical and neuroscience communities would appreciate these basic
>  being fixed without us having to mix compiled source and binaries on
>  the same tree, and not being accorded a "low priority".
>
>  steps required to replaciate : try to install e.g. mitools from
>  universe repository.
>
>
>  Colin
>
> To manage notifications about this bug go to:
> https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/odin/+bug/779170/+subscriptions
>

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/779170

Title:
  Needs porting to DCMTK 3.6

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/odin/+bug/779170/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

Reply via email to