Do we really need to change the ui, here? What if we used the existing friendly-recovery options to decide whether or not to tell mountall to mount read-write? I guess the choice of recovery options that require read-write disk is rather clear.
I also am not nearly as worried about the UI change as I would be about the new code being written for mountall (which would violate FFe). We would need a UI freeze exception, true, but UI Freeze is primarily about *coordinating* changes, not about forbidding them entirely - and this is a significant enough bug in the recovery mode that I think all users are better off with a possibly-untranslated facility than with not having the facility at all. Whereas the mountall changes are risky and could make recovery mode less stable / usable for everyone. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/575469 Title: recovery mode mounts filesystems read-write rather than read-only To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/friendly-recovery/+bug/575469/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
