Not sure if this is related or if I am doing something wrong, but this
looks like it is also present in Lucid.  I built a custom kernel to add
PPS support.  The first version went well, however re-building with
newer (or older) source from the Git repos yields
'/proc/version_signature' to lie.

My first build was with 2.6.32-33.66; version sig is correct, was also running 
native 2.6.32-33.66 at the time.
The next was with 2.6.32-33.72; version sig still says 2.6.32-33.66, running 
2.6.32-33.66 w/PPS patch at the time.
Last test was with 2.6.32-28.55; version sig still says 2.6.32-33.66, running 
2.6.32-33.72 w/PPS patch at the time.

Tried on two systems...any one have any ideas why this is happening?
The kernels work fine otherwise.  Thanks.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/794698

Title:
  hardy custom binary kernels have incorrect version reported in
  /proc/version_signature

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/794698/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

Reply via email to