Hi,
Apologies for the delayed response. wrestling with windows 7 on another box.

Yes, what newcomers and I suggest most regular users want is certainty. 
If the system can upgrade fully do it . If it can't then don't attempt 
or offer a partial upgrade. Unless you are a Linux expert and most of us 
are not it is just taking people into an area of problems they cannot 
resolve for themselves.
What the system needs to do if it cannot perform the full upgrade is to 
tell you why it cannot. List and direct you to the missing packages it 
needs to be able to perform the full upgrade. What threw me was that 
update manager was saying nothing was outstanding. That may have been 
correct in respect of the packages it had correctly installed and 
subsequently updated but it was not telling me at that point, that 
certain key packages may have failed to install properly and therefore 
were not showing as needing an update. It was able to tell me this( 
without listing the missing packages) when of course it was to late and 
I was stuck in the middle of a hotchpoch of a partial upgrade I could 
not then put right.
Hope these comments are useful
regards
Peter

On 06/07/2011 02:56, RedSingularity wrote:
> Thanks for reporting this.  Just to confirm, are you saying it would be best 
> to remove the 'partial upgrade' option from update-manager?
> ---
> Ubuntu Bug Squad volunteer triager
> http://wiki.ubuntu.com/BugSquad
>
> ** Changed in: update-manager (Ubuntu)
>         Status: New =>  Incomplete
>

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/802991

Title:
  failure to upgrade from 10.10 to 11.04

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/update-manager/+bug/802991/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

Reply via email to