@Adrian Roman: > what you say below about being the "controlling jerk"
What you might have not realized is that this phrase was a quote from comment #168. But I'm glad we agree that this is not a nice way to communicate. The point is: If somebody agues that "if developers for project xy don't add feature A or option B, they are controlling jerks" (or dictators, interface nazis, or whatever insult is in vogue lately), then the one trying to dictate is actually the user, not the developer. > you just want it that way period It's irrelevant what I want. What you might not realize (although I said it several times, e.g. in comment #99) is that I am not one of NotifyOSD's designers. I am also not one of its developers. Those are the ones that you should try to convince. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/390508 Title: notifyOSD ignores the expire timeout parameter -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
