Everything may have been said. Nevertheless, I feel I need to add to it. Unity is less effective than the old default. As long as there is less than, say, four windows open it does work. However, when I have to work with several applications simultaneously and when there are several windows for each application, it becomes difficult to pick the one I need. When you take away my taskbar you should give me something that is able to replace it. Unity can't do that. Furthermore, working with more than one desktop is a very useful feature that was even adopted even by Mac OS. This feature becomes useless when your launcher keeps displaying everything at once, no matter how many desktops you are using. "Ubuntu Classic" is still available but works worse than it used to. I need to run "compiz --replace & exit" every time I log in because unless I do so, drag and drop to the taskbar won't work. The notion of a Unity-only future makes me feel quite uncomfortable. Please, Mr. Shuttleworth, do consider if making Unity the default might have been a mistake. Obviously, many users think so, and those who do not have so far failed to present actual reasons supporting their opinion.
-- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/648180 Title: Unity is not an adequate replacement for Gnome2 (and sucks a little bit less then it used to) -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
