Gnome3 shell is coming along fantastically. It's leaving Unity in the dirt. (I'm using the Gnome3 PPA and loving it)
If personally feel if someone hadn't allowed their pride to be hurt we'd be going in a better direction now. I don't feel it's right denying users the choice, when such a fantastic range of choice exists. Radio Dialogs and Dropdowns are computationally cheap, and they can be hidden away in an "Advanced" button/tab in the installer without confusing new users. Doesn't make sense to me having so many forks when all these problems (and more) could be solved in the installer. As for the space requirements of such a task, there is no reason to limit an iso to 700mb anymore. cd's have effectively died out and internet bandwidth has increased (a smaller version of course still has it's uses and needs) User Upgrades should _NOT_ change the users current shell. It's part of the reason I'm so ticked off about it. It's a betrayal of trust. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/648180 Title: Unity is not an adequate replacement for Gnome2 (and sucks a little bit less then it used to) -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list [email protected] https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
