Note, I'm struggling with swt-gtk at the moment. I've got it built, but
everything using webkit crashes inside soup_session_get_feature. I've
islolated it down to a pointer returned from webkit_get_default_session
losing its upper 32-bits somewhere (I'm testing this on a 64-bit
machine).

This is happening here inside libswt-webkit-gtk.so:

0000000000006791 
<Java_org_eclipse_swt_internal_webkit_WebKitGTK__1webkit_1get_1default_1session>:
    6791:       55                      push   %rbp
    6792:       48 89 e5                mov    %rsp,%rbp
    6795:       48 83 ec 20             sub    $0x20,%rsp
    6799:       48 89 7d e8             mov    %rdi,-0x18(%rbp)
    679d:       48 89 75 e0             mov    %rsi,-0x20(%rbp)
    67a1:       48 c7 45 f8 00 00 00    movq   $0x0,-0x8(%rbp)
    67a8:       00 
    67a9:       b8 00 00 00 00          mov    $0x0,%eax
    67ae:       e8 ed e3 ff ff          callq  4ba0 
<webkit_get_default_session@plt>
    67b3:       48 98                   cltq   
    67b5:       48 89 45 f8             mov    %rax,-0x8(%rbp)
    67b9:       48 8b 45 f8             mov    -0x8(%rbp),%rax
    67bd:       c9                      leaveq 
    67be:       c3                      retq   

Note that there is a cltq instruction after returning from
webkit_get_default_session which sign expands %eax -> %rax, and seems
wrong to me. I can't work out why it ends up there (it doesn't get added
to the return of any other function, and I can't spot anything obvously
different at the source level). I've confirmed that if I hack the binary
and replace the cltq with 2 nop's, then the problem goes away and
everything using webkit works properly.

Matthias - any ideas about this?

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/740815

Title:
  [FFe] Updates to enable us to drop xulrunner from main

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

Reply via email to